The United States blasted vip com fake plagiarism provoke controversy

Nanfang Daily (reporter / Ye Dan) in the major electricity supplier for the April promotion fight fight at outrance when the electricity supplier industry "slobber war" also started again. The afternoon of April 17th, Liu Huipu, senior vice president of jumei.com micro-blog, "we really have no plans to buy vip.com" as the topic, publicly accused vip.com of copying jumei.com part in the sale of cosmetics trademark license, copy and page design. Subsequently, jumei.com CEO Chen Ou forwarding micro-blog, and vip.com CEO Shen Ya respond.

Micro-blog

Liu Huipu in the long pointed out that the variety of the United States to obtain an exclusive license of goods on sale in the vip.com brand, and posted a reply. The message display includes nine cloud, horse oil belongs to Claire S and rainbow mask said the official vip.com is not authorized to sell their products, the brand is still the message expressed doubts on the authenticity of the goods. Liu Huipu pointed out that the only product in micro-blog copy the United States authorized cosmetics, authorized by a variety of the sales page directly copy the United States, even the "United States" logo are not removed. Long micro-blog, said the South Korean JK company on April 16th issued a statement accusing vip.com of illegal misappropriation of documents and sales of products. Liu Huipu said, for this, nearly 100 alleged infringement screenshots have all legal notarized, the United States Department of justice immediately issued a lawyer’s letter, asked vip.com to immediately offline copy infringement, and public apology.

from jumei.com for vip.com "accused" some Korean goods "suspected fake", "page copy", vip.com to the response sent to the Southern Daily said: "vip.com has sold products are authorized and authentic, genuine Pacific Insurance to ensure ease of consumers shopping. We cooperate with the legitimate dealers authorized by the brand side or the brand side to purchase goods from the formal legal channels."

on the so-called plagiarism page, vip.com also clarified that there is no so-called plagiarism. "These beauty products are designed by the supplier. The page appears to be the problem of vip.com to provide suppliers with the design of the page is not strictly caused by the audit, but the product is not a problem, are legitimate genuine. The incident also revealed that we are not strict in the page design audit. The company has once again strengthened the page review mechanism to ensure that no longer the same problem." According to vip.com to the Nanfang Daily reporters, as of press time, has not received any letter from jumei.com.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *